School budgets slashed by $148 million as deputies forced back to classroom (2024)

  • National
  • NSW
  • Education
By Lucy Carroll

,

register

or subscribe

to save articles for later.

Save articles for later

Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.

NSW public schools will have their budgets slashed by up to $148 million this year as thousands of deputy and assistant principals are forced back into classroom teaching roles to help deal with chronic staffing shortages.

In a letter to principals on Tuesday afternoon, NSW Education Department secretary Murat Dizdar said school budgets would be reduced by 1.25 per cent, and any accumulated unspent discretionary funds frozen over the next year.

School budgets slashed by $148 million as deputies forced back to classroom (1)

“After multiple years with falling student enrolments, we need to ensure we are prioritising our teachers delivering quality teaching and learning to our students across all schools,” Dizdar said.

“While overall funding remains at record levels, to reflect the reduction in enrolments, address teacher shortages and better manage above centrally funded positions across the state, flexible funding for most schools will be reduced this year.”

Under the changes, deputy principals will be expected to teach a minimum of one day each week, while head teachers and assistant principals are now expected to be in the classroom at least three days a week.

Assistant principals in curriculum and instruction – those in charge of overseeing major syllabus reforms across schools – will not have their classroom teaching hours increased.

Dizdar said the budget cuts came “from necessity” as the state government attempted to ensure effective and efficient funding of public schools that matches enrolments and student needs.

Public school enrolments have declined since 2019, with about 25,000 fewer students enrolled in public schools last year compared with before the pandemic. The proportion of pupils in state schools fell to 62.9 per cent last year, the lowest share in two decades of reporting.

Budgets had been maintained through the pandemic and natural disasters, Dizdar said, despite falling enrolments as the private school system increases its student numbers.

Advertisem*nt

“At the same time, more school flexible funding has been used to pay for a significant increase in additional executive positions in schools, which has put pressure on the teacher shortages our schools face,” he said.

About 4000 assistant principal, deputy head and executive backroom teachers have been appointed since the Local Schools, Local Decisions policy was launched in 2012, a controversial reform that meant the bulk of NSW’s multibillion-dollar schools budget was taken away from the department and given to principals.

On Monday, the Herald reported that schools across NSW were facing budget cuts after the government boosted salaries for top-of-the-scale public school teachers from $113,042 to $122,100. New graduates received a $10,000 rise.

The government indicated it would fund the once-in-a-generation increases by reducing executive teachers, consultants and labour hire.

At Davidson High School in Frenchs Forest parents are lobbying the government for upgrades to the school hall, while at St Ives High, parents are being asked to fund wellbeing programs, shade cloths, textbooks and buses.

Schools are also dealing with ongoing teacher shortages, with about 1800 vacancies at the start of this term, down from total full-time equivalent vacancies of 1990 in term 4.

Earlier this year, the department said it was making thousands of calls to teachers who have retired or quit in a bid to entice them back before the school year resumes.

School budgets slashed by $148 million as deputies forced back to classroom (2)

From data provided in February to a NSW Budget Estimates hearing, at least 4000 calls had been made to former teachers and about 80 retired teachers had taken up positions.

NSW Education Minister Prue Car said student outcomes were a priority, and it was essential that teachers spend their time in the classroom.

Loading

“This reform will enable us to re-set and get on with the important job of repairing the NSW education system. In doing this, we are asking principals to make decisions that will help schools address the staffing issues they face across the state,” she said.

NSW Primary Principals Association president Robyn Evans said the funding cuts meant tighter budgets for schools which might be incredibly difficult to implement.

“This is going to be really hard for many schools and we’ll be prioritising teaching and learning in classrooms,” she said. “At the moment, people are asking more questions than we have answers for,” Evans said.

NSW Secondary Principals’ Association president Craig Petersen said the cuts could affect schools planning upgrades to classrooms, playgrounds or other infrastructure.

“It could also affect the number of temporary teachers employed and school learning support officers,” he said.

Loading

Opposition education spokeswoman Sarah Mitchell said parents will see the impact of budget cuts through the lack of support for their children.

“This government promised that schools would not be impacted by the budget decisions. But we now know that is not the case. For schools midway through the year to be told their budget allocations will be cut is not acceptable, and makes it very difficult for principals to ensure students get the support they need,” said Mitchell.

With Daniella White

Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.

,

register

or subscribe

to save articles for later.

License this article

  • Education
  • For subscribers

Most Viewed in National

Loading

School budgets slashed by $148 million as deputies forced back to classroom (2024)

FAQs

School budgets slashed by $148 million as deputies forced back to classroom? ›

NSW public schools will have their budgets slashed by up to $148 million this year as thousands of deputy and assistant principals are forced back into classroom teaching roles to help deal with chronic staffing shortages.

What are the effects of budget cuts on education? ›

First, the spending declines that followed the Great Recession halted a five-decade-long increase in student test scores in reading and math. Second, those cuts also were associated with slower rates of college-going among students on track to become first-time college freshmen.

Which consequence results from budget cuts in education? ›

Budget cuts in education lead to a reduction in teacher numbers, larger class sizes, and cuts to educational programs, ultimately diminishing the quality of education. This negatively affects students' learning experiences, employment prospects, and broader societal outcomes.

How does underfunding affect students? ›

However, in underfunded schools, students often must deal with large class sizes, fewer advanced classes, lack of resources, less experienced teachers, and, in some cases, no teacher at all.

What percentage of a school budget is funded by the federal government? ›

The federal government allocated $34.2 billion in relief aid during the pandemic; federal funds accounted for 23% of K–12 funding in 2020–21 and 11% in 2021–22. In most non-recession years before the pandemic, the federal share ranged from 6% to 9%.

What strategies should a school leader use when faced with budget cuts? ›

Strategies to Consider

Some budget reductions affect student learning and well-being more than others, and the choices often come with tradeoffs. Considering the tradeoffs carefully can help reduce the negative effects of budget cuts. Delaying pay raises or furloughing non-working staff can reduce layoffs.

Do school spending cuts matter? ›

Cohorts exposed to these spending cuts had lower test scores and lower college-going rates. The test score impacts were larger for children in poor neighborhoods. Evidence suggests that both test scores and college-going were more adversely affected for Black and White students than Latinx students.

Does school funding affect student achievement? ›

The results indicate that a $1,000 increase in per-pupil spending experienced for 3 consecutive years led to a full grade-level improvement in both math and reading achievement, relative to what the average student achieved prior to the funding increases.

What are the negative effects of budgeting? ›

Disadvantages of budgeting
  • a budget could be inflexible, and not allow for unexpected circ*mstances.
  • creating and monitoring a budget can be time consuming.
  • budgeting could create competition and conflict between teams or departments.
  • if targets are unrealistic, employees could become stressed and under pressure.

How do budgeting and funding influence teacher and student progress? ›

A robust body of research shows that across a variety of outcomes such as test scores, graduation rates, and college attendance, student performance improves with greater spending.

What are the major causes of funding inequalities in education? ›

There are many factors that contribute to educational inequity, including poverty, racism, and inadequate funding for schools in low-income areas. To address these challenges, policymakers and educators must take a multifaceted approach that includes several key strategies.

How does funding affect teachers? ›

Lack of funding means low salaries for teachers. Cuts to education spending affect all aspects of students' academic experience, from the condition of the school building to the courses offered and the teachers in the classroom. In fact, teacher salaries and benefits account for the majority of public school spending.

Why is education so underfunded? ›

White and middle-class families leaving urban cores in previous decades devastated local tax bases, leaving many schools chronically underfunded. Because American schools have traditionally been funded largely through local property taxes, high-poverty districts often received paltry resources.

Which state spends the least on education? ›

Among the 41 states with reported data, New York schools led the nation in per-pupil spending in 2021 and 2022, spending $26,571 in 2021 and $27,504 in 2022. Idaho spent the least, with $9,053 in 2021 and $9,670 in 2022, respectively. This data will be updated to include all states in spring 2024.

Who spends the most on education? ›

Norway reported the highest total expenditures on education institutions as a percentage of GDP (6.6 percent), followed by Chile (6.5 percent), Israel (6.2 percent), Australia (6.1 percent), and the United Kingdom and the United States (both 6.0 percent).

Which country spends the most on education per student? ›

Out of the OECD countries, Luxembourg was the country that spent the most on educational institutions per full-time student in 2020. On average, 23,000 U.S dollars were spent on primary education, nearly 27,000 U.S dollars on secondary education, and around 53,000 U.S dollars on tertiary education.

How does lack of funding affect teachers? ›

With less money, schools often cut their school-wide technology and material budgets. Teachers and media specialists who have researched and asked for specific products or items will find that these will not be available for their use.

How state budgets are breaking US schools? ›

America's school systems are funded by the 50 states. In this fiery talk, Bill Gates says that state budgets are riddled with accounting tricks that disguise the true cost of health care and pensions and are weighted with worsening deficits -- with the financing of education at the losing end.

Why is it important to have a budget for school? ›

The budget—and accompanying process—provides school districts and their leaders with an opportunity to justify the collection and expenditure of public funds. School budget resources come from a combination of local, state and federal contributions.

What are the benefits of increasing education budget? ›

Five impacts of increased school spending
  • Test scores. The most direct effect of increasing school spending is that it improves the academic performance of students in the form of higher standardized test scores. ...
  • Increased graduation and college matriculation. ...
  • Increased wages. ...
  • Lower social costs. ...
  • Intergenerational effects.
Dec 7, 2023

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Pres. Carey Rath

Last Updated:

Views: 5730

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 84% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Pres. Carey Rath

Birthday: 1997-03-06

Address: 14955 Ledner Trail, East Rodrickfort, NE 85127-8369

Phone: +18682428114917

Job: National Technology Representative

Hobby: Sand art, Drama, Web surfing, Cycling, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Leather crafting, Creative writing

Introduction: My name is Pres. Carey Rath, I am a faithful, funny, vast, joyous, lively, brave, glamorous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.